Monthly Archives: January 2013

Ria van Elk’s Forsythia in Hunt Institute’s International Exhibition

The Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation has invited my mother, Ria van Elk, to take part in their upcoming international exhibition. The Forsythia will be part of the 14th International Exhibition of Botanical Art and Illustration, Fall 2013. The Hunt Institute is a research division of Carnegie Mellon University (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania).

The exhibition will be held from September 26 until December 19, 2013. After that it will turn into a touring exhibition, which will be traveling throughout the United States. At the end of the exhibition Ria van Elk’s painting will become part of the collection of the Hunt Institute. It will then be available for students of the Institute to be used for presentations, research and as reference material for watercoloring techniques and composition.

The Information Age

In the past there were times when I thought that I knew everything I needed to know. And if I accidentally bumped into something that I thought I needed to know everything about and didn’t, or missed some detailed information on, I went out of my way to find the missing pieces. Or I just convinced myself that after some inquiries I knew everything there was to know about it. Problem solved. Because it really was a problem. Not knowing, not having all the information, that just equaled to not being in control. And being in control was everything.

Now, I realize, the older I get the less I know–and the less I want to know. Not knowing and not wanting to know is a relief. I don’t need to have an explanation for every situation, for everything that happens, for everything that people say or do. It just is. That doesn’t necessarily mean I am not in control. I just care less about it. Control is optional, not a prerequisite.

And since that is my starting point, I get to learn so much more. All the stuff I thought was real, was the truth, was set in stone, is now open to debate. Or rather, it doesn’t need to be debated. The thing is, if I debate it, collect information on it, form an opinion about it, I run the risk of thinking that that what I am looking at that particular moment in time is the only truth. And when that is my starting point, I will only want to defend and hold my position on the subject. After all, I did all the work. So, I know, right?

No, I don’t.

Over the (last couple of) years, I have come to realize that I should consider the possibility of the (co)existence of multiple truths. I don’t have to discard the things I know, I don’t have to abandon the stuff I hold true, I just have to make room for other truths, for the things that matter to others. Regardless of the fact that that other truth may clash with mine.

Now, am I done with this? In reaching this point, this insight, is this it? Hah… Not by a long shot. I need to study this further and I have to keep on confronting myself with ‘inconvenient truths’. And who knows, maybe I’ll even write a little more about it, right here.